How we did it: 1,000 Facebook fans in 25 days

Posted: 9 September 2009 | By: | No Comments »

In about a month, The Daily Tar Heel’s Facebook fan count has grown by slightly more than 1,000 people — approximately 250 percent. How?

We created our Facebook page in early March, but beyond entering basic info and setting a profile picture, we didn’t do much with the page in terms of interacting with readers. Our fan count was growing gradually, but lacked any sort of momentum.

The community manager post at the DTH is a new one this year. We felt like devoting one person — Emily Stephenson — as the face behind our social media accounts would increase the quality of our interactions with readers. The rapidly growing number of fans validates this theory, and because a good amount of traffic to our Web site generates from Facebook, the more fans we have who are potentially clicking through to our Web site clearly benefits us in the long run.

On a daily basis, Emily chooses selected articles to post on our Facebook page. Other times she asks readers for input for future stories we’re working on. Sometimes she asks for feedback on stories we’ve written. She responds whenever readers ask questions, and she’s also solicited reader-submitted photos via Facebook. Emily’s also the face behind @dailytarheel on Twitter (which has seen considerable growth in followers since mid-August too, but had a much more developed fan base than our Facebook page initially).

What Emily’s doing isn’t rocket science, but the results show there’s incredible value in what she’s doing. They also show how much news organizations can benefit by just talking and listening to readers online. Fancy apps are great, but they can’t replace basic reader-reporter relationships.

Filed under: social media, The Daily Tar Heel

..........................................................................................................................................................

No Comments on “How we did it: 1,000 Facebook fans in 25 days”

  1. 1 William P. Davis said at 12:21 am on September 12th, 2009:

    Those are fantastic numbers, to be sure. What’s your bounce rate like, though? I know when I look at traffic that comes from Facebook and Twitter the bounce rate is much higher than site average. Roll your efforts into promoting your e-mail edition — our bounce rate from that is fantastically low.

  2. 2 Sara Gregory said at 12:51 pm on September 12th, 2009:

    Our bounce rate from Facebook/Twitter is slightly higher than our site average, but only by a couple percentage points. We actually don’t get very much traffic from our e-mail edition – but likely part of that is because we’re still having problems with registration on the site. The bounce rate from that though is about what the same as our overall average.

  3. 3 William P. Davis said at 1:49 am on September 13th, 2009:

    Interesting. For us, our bounce rate from our e-mail edition is 20 percent lower than site average, and the bounce rate from Facebook is 5 percent above average.


Leave a Reply